Hockey game information


Hockey bad


The Canadian Press is reporting that the overall significance of this is that several teams are still struggling. The annual report from Forbes found that the average NHL franchise was worth about $228 million, which is up 2% from last year. The kicker is that 14 out of 30 teams saw their values decline.
The Toronto Maple Leafs predictably lead the pack at $505 million. The rest of the numbers showcase the divide between those franchises that have a lot of value and those that do not. Contrast the Leafs’ numbers with the value of the Edmonton Oilers, who are worth $183 million.
The Calgary Flames come in at $206 million, while the Montreal Canadiens rank at $408 million. The Senators linger near the middle with $196 million and the Vancouver Canucks round out at $262 million.
Some of the other big market teams include the obvious, like the New York Rangers at $461 million and the Boston Bruins at $302 million. But as you can see, there’s an awful lot of space between a team like the Leafs and a team like the Oilers.
As Forbes points out in their report, “the NHL has become a two-tiered league.”
You can check out the full report here.

Word around the campfire today is that telecom giant Rogers is looking to buy the Toronto Maple Leafs. Should the deal go down, it would be the biggest transaction in Canadian sports history.
The deal would conceivably be worth more than $1 billion and would also include the NBA’s Toronto Raptors, Toronto FC of Major League Soccer and the Marlies, the Maple Leafs’ AHL team. The potential transaction has been outlined in the Toronto Star using anonymous sources, including a top sports executive who requested to remain nameless in the reporting.
By purchasing a majority stake in Maple Leafs Sports and Entertainment and the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, Rogers would become one of the most powerful sports enterprises in North America.
According to the Star’s sources, the deal would also include Leafs and Raptors television stations. The real estate holdings, however, would be off-limits.
Richard Peddie, MLSE’s CEO, declined comment other than to say that it was a “shareholder matter” and that he had not been involved in any discussions.
For now, we can choose to take the Star’s sources however we wish. With no other evidence to support this story at press time, I can only treat it as a rumour. So it goes.

This is a story that simply makes my blood boil.
Mere hours after Pat Burns was laid to rest, somebody broke into the vehicle belonging to his wife. Montreal police say that somebody smashed one of the car’s windows as it was parked overnight a few blocks away from the cathedral. They took some of the possessions inside, including 30 autographed hockey jerseys set to be donated to charity and other items.
“There’s two suitcases with clothes belonging to Pat Burns and his wife,” Lemieux said. “There’s a Movado watch for men. There’s also family pictures, credit cards, iPad, jewelry belonging to his wife.”
The credit cards were taken out of Pat Burns’ wallet.
According to police, the spineless crooks might try to sell some of the items due to their high profile. Burns’ widow says she just wants the items back and the late coach’s son Jason agrees. “It’s a good thing to bring it back so we can do the job we wanted to do with the shirts,” said Jason. “There were a bunch of hockey jerseys that were going to foundations for needy people.”
“They went through his stuff,” said Const. Anie Lemieux of the Montreal police. “The person who left with the shirts and everything knows that this is Pat Burns’ stuff.”
I’ve been criticized for obscenity on this blog before, so I think I’ll just leave this story as is.

Reports say that about 1,500 people headed into the Mary Queen of the World Cathedral to pay their respects to legendary NHL coach Pat Burns.
The funeral took place in the afternoon and went for about two hours, with eulogies by Burns’ cousin and New Jersey Devils GM Lou Lamoriello. Burns’ courage was the topic of the day, if there was one, and Msgr. Robert Sansoucy’s sermon focused on the importance of hockey. Interestingly, Burns’ ashes were in an urn shaped like the Stanley Cup.
“It gives me a big smile, every time I think of Pat,” said New Jersey netminder Martin Brodeur. “We won a Stanley Cup together, and at the same time I got the chance to get pretty close to him, riding motorcycles. We had plenty of fun together.”
Quebec Premier Jean Charest was also at the service. “Leadership in sports, like in life, business, or politics, always comes down to the same ingredients. You have to prove you have a lot of determination. You have to be capable of vision,” Charest said. “Burns had an exceptional career, he was a very generous man … and he had a positive effect everywhere he went.”
Hockey luminaries at the funeral included Patrick Roy, Guy Carbonneau, Carey Price, Brian Gionta, Scott Gomez, Jacques Demers, Kirk Muller, Raymond Bourque, and Yvan Cournoyer. Members of the Gatineau police department, where Burns served as an officer prior to his NHL coaching career, also attended.
Cardinal Jean-Claude Turcotte led the services.

Sunday saw Atlanta Thrashers defenceman Dustin Byfuglien dominate again, putting four points on the scoreboard as his team took down the Boston Bruins.
Byfuglien scored his fifth game-winner and chipped in with three helpers to gather up a 4-1 win for his club over the Bruins. This is Byfuglien’s fourth goal in five games, giving his nine points through the Thrashers’ current five game winning streak and 25 points in 24 games overall. That’s good enough to lead all NHL defencemen in both goals and total points thus far.
Looking at these statistics, it’s hard not to think of Byfuglien as dominant. In typical hockey player fashion, however, he takes the humbler road. “I feel comfortable,” he said. “I wouldn’t put myself out there as dominating, but I’m just out there playing good hockey and having fun and trying to play as a team.”
Sunday’s game was another example of Byfuglien’s ability to do it all on the ice. He creates turnovers, clears the crease, handles the puck, and creates offensive opportunities.
Perhaps it’s the move to Atlanta that has given the bulky defenceman that extra jump, as he’s now the go-to guy on the roster and has been revelling in the role. Sure, he was clearly a good player back on the Chicago Blackhawks, but Byfuglien’s surging start with the Thrashers is something else altogether.

Badminton Rules


Basic Badminton Rules
Badminton is always enjoyable game so we try to always enjoy it.If you are not able to rule of badminton you dont play this game .So you have need know to rule of badminton.  Learn the Basic Badminton Rules and you can start to enjoy the game.

Of course if you intend to play competitively, it's important that you know all of the badminton rules. For social and leisure purposes, I think this will do.
Introduction
Before the 2006 Thomas/ Uber Cup, the official scoring format was the 15 points format. The IBF (International Badminton Federation) then tested a new scoring format which is the 21 points rally format in the 2006 Thomas/Uber Cup. This 21 points rally format has since become the official one replacing the 15 points format.

15 Points Format
There are a lot of people who still prefer the old format. So I have listed down the basic badminton rules for this format here if you have this preference.

- To win a match, you have to win 2 out of 3 games.

- To win a game, you have to score 15 points for men and 11 points for women.

- If the score becomes 14-all (10-all in women's singles), the side which first scored 14 (10) shall exercise the choice to continue the game to 15 (11) points or to 'set' the game to 17 (13) points.

- If you win a rally in which your opposition served, you win back the service rights.

- Only the serving side can add a point to its score.

- You score a point when your opponent could not return the shuttle or the shuttle he/she returns fall out of bounds.

- In singles, you will serve on the right service court when your score is an even number while you will serve on the left service court when your score is an odd number.

- In doubles, if you serve and receive first on the right service court during a match, you will continue to serve there when the score of your side in an even number. Reverse pattern for your partner.

21 points Format
Currently, this is the official format used by the IBF. Here are the basic badminton rules for this format.

- To win a match, you have to win 2 out of 3 games.

- To win a game, you have to score 21 points.

- If a score becomes 20-20, the side which scores 2 consecutive points shall win that game.

- If the score becomes 29-29, the side that scores the 30th point shall win that game.

- There are no "service over", meaning you can score a point no matter who serves.

- One service only for doubles.

- Other rules shall remain the same.



So what is the difference between these two formats you may ask? For one, the old format requires more time to finish a match as there are 'service overs'. The level of fitness and stamina is really important. It is not unusual to see a match last for 2 hours.

The new format however requires less time to finish a match as it is a rally point system. It is now quite common to see matches finished just below an hour. Avoiding making unforced errors is crucial here because every rally counts.

Decide for yourself on which format you want to use. I would suggest that you familiarize yourself with the new format in case you become more serious with this game. Understand the basic badminton rules already? .

Cricket enjoy

Cricket are enjoyable game and it popular game all of the game. It is news for cricket if you are wanted to know about large or enjoy to flow our advise. The second Ashes Test begins in Adelaide on Friday morning with honors’ even. By all accounts England 'won' the opening stalemate at the Gabba but you can't bank good form. 16 months ago in Cardiff Australia battered the home side to the very brink, saw Graham Onions and Monty Panesar hang on for 0-0, and rode that wave into a 115-run defeat at Lord's. Ricky Ponting handed over the urn five weeks later after a 2-1 reverse. Australia had scored as many runs for six wickets as England did for 18 in the 2009 opener, one ball from victory for an excruciating hour. In the abstract last weekend at Brisbane does not compare. Each side managed only 11 wickets and the match result was safe for a day and change. If there is a running theme between the first Tests then and now it is Australian indifference. Despite their dominance at Lord's over 75 years they failed to convince after the Welsh disappointment; following the humiliation of Sunday and Monday they are no-one's idea of a top Test team. This is hardly breaking news but for Englishmen the new reality of ordinary Oz takes some getting used to. This home identity crisis is born out in more selection uncertainty. Ryan Harris and Doug Bollinger have been added to the squad for the Adelaide Oval as Ponting looks for a pace attack with some penetration. Why two extra seamers? Harris and Bollinger were both cut from the original 17-man squad for Brisbane due to supposed injury doubts but it would be nonsense to call up a player of questionable fitness between back-to-back Tests. Mitchell Johnson was the man most vulnerable after a grim all-round performance last week (a duck, a dropped dolly and nought for 170) and the axe has now fallen on him; Bollinger should be front of the queue after his surprising omission last Thursday. It would be a like-for-like swap in bowling terms, left-arm balance retained and hopefully a little control added. But Bollinger is a batting rabbit and Johnson a Test centurion so that change on its own would open up the Aussie tail. After being whipped out so easily in Brisbane on day three, that is a concern. On the other hand Harris has a little substance as a batsman but is an experienced rather than explosive swing bowler. You begin to see why Australia's selectors are doubting themselves. Almost certainly Marcus North is on his final chance, with Usman Khawaja primed for inclusion next time, while Bollinger should replace Johnson, ICC Cricketer of the Year in 2009 but now mistrusted in a four-man attack. Ponting is a confirmed Harris fan but would he drop Ben Hilfenhaus or Peter Siddle, attack-leader and hat-trick hero in Brisbane respectively? Changing two of the three seamers but keeping Xavier Doherty would be an admission of desperation, bringing us back to the question: why Harris and Bollinger? Do Australia not even know their best XI? For England coach Andy Flower, who missed part of the first Test having a life-threatening cancer removed, there will be no team changes. The biggest issues are Paul Collingwood and Graeme Swann, but both have more than earned the right to one poor Test match. It was inevitable that Australia came at Swann hard with a calculated plan. The manner in which he responds in Adelaide will have a significant influence on the Test and the series. Collingwood faces replacement with Eoin Morgan in the next 12 months but it will take something drastic to force such action in Australia. There has also been mischievous suggestion that Ajmal Shahzad might replace Steven Finn on account of the Yorkshireman's skid and reverse-swing. Flower was brutal in dropping Onions for a 'rest' in Johannesburg at the start of the year, so the idea cannot be discounted. But Finn, like Siddle, has six wickets from Brisbane so would be hugely disappointed. England will be happy with how things look and reluctant to take risks. The Adelaide surface is expected to be flat initially and the boundaries are short. Winning the toss is an advantage but, again, Ashes history offers a note of caution. Of all the humiliations England have suffered in Australia their last visit here was among the worst for the very reason that they batted first and thought they would win - having declared their first innings they were bowled out in 73 overs second time around, losing by six wick